Happy Anniversary

3 Jan

Today is the 3rd January 2014 – 181 years since a small, outnumbered, British force in HMS Clio ejected a trespassing garrison and its accompanying ship-of-war from the British Falkland Islands.

For a relatively minor event the circumstances are well-known. Buenos Aires had revealed its pretensions to the Falkland Islands in its gazetted Decree of 1829 which promptly set off an exchange of letters between Britain’s representative, Woodbine Parish, and the Foreign Office in London. As a result, Parish presented a diplomatic protest to the Government in Buenos Aires pointing out that the archipelago was claimed by Britain and that Buenos Aires would not be permitted to act upon their pretension.

Buenos Aires did not listen however and, in late 1832, sent an armed garrison to Port Louis in an attempt to impose their control over the Falklands. Before that garrison had sailed however, Britain lodged a further protest reminding the Buenos Airean Government of the warning from 1829 but Buenos Aires remained deaf.

Once on the Falklands the garrison raised the Argentine flag and its officer asserted his authority before being promptly murdered by his own troops. Order was restored just in time for the arrival of HMS Clio on January 2nd, 1833. Commander Onslow politely requested that the garrison remove both its flag and itself, but seeing some reluctance to obey the instruction, Onslow ordered that the Argentine flag be lowered, folded with due ceremony and returned to the commander of Argentina’s ship-of-war. With the flag went a polite message to say that it had been “.. found in the territory of His Majesty.”

Argentina’s forces left without further protest and no fight. Nothing more than small police action to remove a group of trespassers from the Falkland Islands. Certainly not the last time that such action would be necessary.

Surprising then that every year Argentina writes to the United Nations and issues a press release complaining of another; “.. anniversary of the illegal occupation of the Malvinas Islands by the United Kingdom.” Surprising that they place such emphasis on such a minor event. No mention of 1829 however, and no mention of the British claim which can be traced back to 1593 – a mere 223 years before what is now Argentina declared itself independent of Spain – and fully 270 years before Argentina became fully recognised as a country in its own right. Yet the anniversary is now marked every year without fail.

Perhaps they are right, perhaps we too should place more emphasis on the action of Commander Onslow in ejecting a superior force from the Falklands without even a single shot being fired. Perhaps we should mark, clearly, the first time that Argentina attempted to take by force something that it had never owned.

So, with that in mind, Happy Anniversary.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/141376337/Falkland-Wars-Argentina-s-1833-Expulsion-Myth

Advertisements

3 Responses to “Happy Anniversary”

  1. Stewart January 3, 2014 at 7:30 am #

    “gazetted Decree of 1929”. Shouldn’t this be 1829?

    • Junius January 3, 2014 at 10:08 am #

      Well spotted 🙂

  2. Biguggy January 3, 2014 at 11:08 am #

    Now way back in 1946, by UNGA resolution 66, the UNGA accepted that the Falklands was a Non-Self-Governing Territory by virtue of the fact that they accepted the Government of the United Kingdom was going to transmit information on the Territory to the UN in compliance with Article 73 of the UN Charter which deals with Non-Self-Governing Territories (NSGTs).

    Among other things Article 73 of the UN Charter states that the ‘interests’ of the ‘inhabitants’ (not ‘populations’ or ‘peoples’) are ‘paramount’. This leaves no doubt, and no room for debate that the ‘interests’ of the ‘inhabitants’ (Islanders) are above everything else, including the wishes, dreams etc. of Argentina. The only thing that was debatable, until 1971 anyway, was who/what got to determine what the ‘interests’ of the inhabitants were.

    In 1971 the International Court of Justice (ICJ) handed down an Advisory opinion on Namibia in which, paragraph 52 states, inter alia:
    ‘Furthermore, the subsequent development of international law in regard to non-self-governing territories, as enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, made the principle of self-determination applicable to all of them. The concept of the sacred trust was confirmed and expanded to all “territories whose peoples have not yet attained a full measure of self-government” (Art. 73).’

    This removed any doubt as to whom had the right to determine what the ‘interests’ of the ‘inhabitants’ of the Falkland Islands were, the Islanders (inhabitants) themselves.

    In 1965, supported by Argentina, but opposed by the UK, the UNGA declared, by its resolution 2065 that UNGA 1514 did apply to the Falklands, therefore confirming at that time that Argentina agreed that the Falklands were a NSGT.

    It really is now very simple for Argentina, as I see it, with all the International support she has it should be easy. She has to do one of three things:

    1. Get the ICJ to admit that they made mistakes in 1971 and 1975 and that not all NSGTs have the right to self-determination.

    2. Get the UNGA to admit that they were wrong in 1946 and that the Falklands are not a NSGT.

    3. Get the UNGA to admit that they, and Argentina, were wrong in 1965 and that neither UNGA resolution 1514 nor Article 73 of the UN Charter apply to the Falklands.

    I do agree that items 2 & 3 above are in some ways related and to some degree interdependent.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: